The Pink Agendist

by E.B. de Mas, reachable at: pink.agendist@yahoo.com

Tag: homophobia

The Very Predictable Future of the Anti-Gay Debate in Britain & France. A Sense of Déjà-vu.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERAThe Now

This week there was a sacrifice at the altar of Notre Dame de Paris. The extremist right winger, Dominique Venner, 78, shot himself in the head. He was an ardent opponent of the immigration of citizens of the developing world to Europe and just hours before his death he wrote a blog post calling for ‘radical resistance’ to the newly passed French same-sex marriage law. Mr. Venner’s pathological narcissism is the perfect illustration of the mind-set exploited by right wing groups/ideology. They build up their self-importance to such an extent where they feel that every action, undertaken anywhere, is directly related to their being. This is the only viable thought process for an individual to be so utterly and personally offended by contracts that only concern the rights of the signatories in regards to each other, as is the case of a marriage contract.

In civil law, which is the only law governments should concern themselves with, marriage is a partnership agreement. Not unlike when two people get together to open a business. In fact my business partnership contract is extraordinarily similar to a marriage contract. There are a series of rights and responsibilities outlined in said contract. If my partner builds up debt, I’m partially liable. I have certain duties regarding the functioning of our business, as does she. The main difference, which is merely technical, is that we’re friends rather than lovers. Mr. Venner’s delusion is tantamount to me being offended by the minutiae of the private contractual agreements he may or may not have had with his wife (if he had one) or his contract with his publisher. I’m quite certain very few, if any, French gays ever concerned themselves with Mr. Venner’s legal or bureaucratic affairs. Worse of all, he led himself to believe that ending his life in a theatrical scene would have an effect on the decisions of private citizens to sign contracts giving each other certain rights. Sorry Mr. Venner, if Mike and I ever decide to get a French union at the French consulate in Seville, the fact you ruined some unfortunate janitor’s day at Notre Dame will not affect our decision! I could go on and on about his grandiose delusions including his choice of venue for his very public suicide, but they speak for themselves.

tonyhopkinsThe Then

The past few weeks were a very déjà-vu experience for us. Almost everything that’s been happening in France, then Britain, happened in Spain many years ago. I remember, because I was a vociferous part of it. I campaigned in 2004 and 2005 for gay marriage. We were confronted with the exact same accusations and sometimes even intimidation by right wing political and religious groups. We suffered the indignity of an ardently Catholic doctor named Aquilino Polaino being taken before parliament to give unscientific testimony, dragging out myths of yesteryear, such as gay men being the result of absent fathers and domineering mothers. Sorry lesbians, you never get mentioned by those people because apparently, you don’t exist- you just haven’t met the right guy yet! During Mr. Polaino’s testimony, I was sitting at the computer, and I was researching his writing. I had the tremendous pleasure of finding his essays on demonic possession. Before his testimony was over, I’d sent hundreds of letters to every LGBT association in Spain with copies of it and to the dean of the University at which he was said to work. In reality he didn’t even work there anymore. The dean put out a statement rejecting Polaino’s views and sent me a very nice personal note. The aftermath of the doctor’s testimony is history. Later, the Catholic church paid millions to bus people from all over Spain to protest against gay marriage in Madrid. American Evangelical right wing groups sent people to Spain to assist, instruct and sell their anti-gay propaganda to two groups replicating the American Hate Group model. They were called Hazteoir and Foro de la Familia. Even call centre type bunkers were set up in the American south, by Evangelical groups, intended to drown Spanish internet publications/message boards with their anti-gay propaganda (fortunately, easily recognizable due to their repetitiveness and unfamiliarity with European Spanish) .

Their efforts were in vain.

The What’s To Come

Just as in France today, we had the die-hard bigots. Mayors and even judges who assured us they would refuse to enforce the law. They would not perform marriages, they would be conscientious objectors. The PP (Spain’s major right wing party) went as far as to initiate a motion of unconstitutionality at the constitutional court. To make a long story short, none of it worked. It didn’t work because considering the incredibly high level of approval of gay marriage in the under 35′s, if any party wants to remain electable, the hate model is no longer deemed acceptable by a generation that has direct access to information. Now it takes 10 minutes, a computer and google to discredit the misinformation promulgated by anti-gay groups. Educated people know homosexuality isn’t a disease and those who aren’t educated can check with any of the major psychological/psychiatric associations of the world. There’s a meta-study that shows that growing up with gay parents is really no different than growing up with straight parents.  All of that means that time is on our side. It’s on the side of reason. Religious lobbies may go insane and pour tens of millions into anti-gay propaganda (in bursts) and that does have an immediate effect on public opinion, but as the days go by people have time to verify the information. Time to see the sky isn’t falling. Time to recognize they’re being played by groups that have no interest in anything but their votes and/or their money. Now nearly a decade has gone by since the legalization of gay marriage in Spain and socially, Spaniards have not become a culturally different people because of LGBT unions- only perhaps in the sense that there’s more respect for us.

Christine Boutin & the Other Homophobes Sullying the French Flag

DirtyFrenchFlag

During the past year I have had the displeasure to observe the most disgusting debate on gay marriage to have taken place in Western Europe in the 21st century. The French right-wing, effectively the political branch of the Christian/Catholic Right, have been all too happy to replicate the American Right’s model of promoting hatred against gays. They’ve used the same junk “science”, dragged out the same fallacious arguments, and by doing so have created an environment of hate which has endangered the lives of the French LGBT community. Just ask Wilfred de Bruijn, the victim of a recent homophobic attack in Paris.

Wilfred de Bruijn's photograph from his Facebook page

Courtesy of the Environment Created by the French Right Wing.

Today I woke up to one of France’s Homophobes in Chief, Christine Boutin, telling the world that “…there are laws that are superior to those of the Republic. She also mentioned that if she were a mayor she would refuse to perform gay marriages, as a conscientious objector. Boutin’s words echo those of the wing of the Catholic Church that supported Fascism and of proponents of Shariah law. They’re also in line with the American Evangelical movements attempts to make their ideology the law of the land, to the exclusion of all else. What her proposition means in practical terms is that Catholic officials would be free to deny authorizing divorces. Pacifist police officers and soldiers could renege on their duty to protect the public and Jehova’s Witness’ doctors could deny their patients blood transfusions.

I’ve always been proud to hold up my burgundy passport with the crest of the French Republic on its cover reminding me of the values of the Bleu, Blanc et Rouge: Liberty, Equality and Fraternity. For a year I’ve been ashamed a sector of the French citizenry does not believe in those ideals. They are a stain on the flag, the great shame of a country which has historically been a symbol of enlightenment- evidently it was despite the reactionary sector of the populace.

Gay attack victim in France becomes cause celebre, as senate debates same-sex marriage law – The Washington Post

PARIS — The shocking photo of a homophobic attack victim in Paris that went viral on social media this week and caused the French interior minister to weigh in was used as an emblem in a pro-gay rally Wednesday evening.

The bloody image of Wilfred de Bruijn’s cut and bruised face was brandished by gay groups during a demonstration of several thousand people as evidence of their claim that homophobic acts have tripled nationwide over opposition to a law legalizing gay marriage.

Gay attack victim in France becomes cause celebre, as senate debates same-sex marriage law – The Washington Post.

For Republicans, Election Is a Last Stand Against Gay Marriage – The Daily Beast

For Republicans, Election Is a Last Stand Against Gay Marriage

Nov 3, 2012 4:45 AM EDT

The GOP went all out to try to stop the marriage equality movement at the ballot box this year. But in this showdown, they’re about to lose.

There are definitive points in time in politics where an issue becomes, as James Carville and I called it in our 2009 book, “res judicata.” Put simply, serious people stop arguing about it. Think of global warming—more than two-thirds agree it’s happening—or evolution—only four in 10 think we didn’t evolve. At one point, these were raging debates. We’ll remember 2012 as the year that same-sex marriage became res judicata.

For Republicans, Election Is a Last Stand Against Gay Marriage – The Daily Beast.

How Much Does It Pay To Be Anti-Gay? Eight Top Earning Pastors & Their Anti-Gay Propaganda. Is ‘Christian Con-Artistry’ a Tautology?

Click on a pastor’s name to see their anti-gay stance.

Kenneth CopelandAccording to an article by the Associated Press that ran in 2008, “His ministry’s 1,500-acre campus, behind an iron gate a half-hour drive from Fort Worth…includes a church, a private airstrip, a hangar for the ministry’s $17.5 million jet and other aircraft, and a $6 million church owned lakefront mansion.”

“the church disclosed in a property-tax exemption application that his wages were $364,577 in 1995; Copeland’s wife, Gloria, earned $292,593. It’s not clear whether those figures include other earnings, such as special offerings for guest preaching or book royalties.” 

Creflo A. Dollar: The New York Times reported that he drives a Rolls-Royce, is transported in a private jet, owns a million-dollar Atlanta home and a $2.5 million Manhattan apartment.

John HageeAccording to an article in The American Prospect, Hagee, “before he converted his nonprofit Global Evangelism Television into a church in 2004 (thus relieving him of the obligation to file a publicly available tax return), was known to be the highest-paid nonprofit executive in San Antonio, making nearly $1 million a year.”

The article also mentions Hagee’s 2000 book, “God’s Candidate for America,” “published by his nonprofit Global Evangelism Television, which that year used tax-exempt donor money to pay Hagee nearly half a million dollars in salary and deferred compensation for sixteen hours of work a week. Hagee earned another $300,000 from his church.”

Charles E. Blake: According to the Memphis Flyer, Bishop Charles Blake of the West Angeles Church of God in Christ “earns a $900,000 salary and owns a 10,000-square-foot mansion in Beverly Hills while most of his congregation lives in impoverished South Central Los Angeles

Benny Hinn: Hinn said in a 1997 CNN interview that he earned between $500,000 and $1 million each year.

Eddie Long: According to a 2005 Atlanta Journal-Constitution investigation, “during the period between 1997 to 2000, Long received more than $3.07 million worth of compensation and benefits from his non-profit charity, Bishop Eddie Long Ministries Inc.” The investigation found that his compensation included a “$1.4 million six-bedroom, nine-bath home on 20 acres in Lithonia; use of a $350,000 luxury Bentley automobile” and “more than $1 million in salary, including $494,000 in 2000.”

Ed Youngpastor Ed Young of Fellowship Church in Dallas lived in a 10,000 square-foot, $1.5 million home by the city’s Lake Grapevine. “Records show that Young was paid $240,000 a year as a parsonage allowance; that’s in addition what sources say is a $1 million yearly pastor’s salary,” WFAA-TV reported.

Franklin Graham:  president of Billy Graham Evangelistic Association and Samaritan’s Purse, had a total compensation of $1.2 million in 2008. Criticism over his high compensation during a slowed economy led Graham to announce in 2009 that he would give up new contributions to his retirement plans from the two organizations he leads, according to McClatchy Newspapers.

The Real Homosexual Agenda by Jack Moore

 

 Jack Moore

Gay.net – Andrew Shirvell Ordered to Pay Millions for Defaming Gay Student

Gay.net – Andrew Shirvell Ordered to Pay Millions for Defaming Gay Student.

John Carroll: Gays Giveth and Gays Taketh Away: An Open Letter to Bailey Hanks

Absolutely fantastic open letter from John Carrol to Bailey Hanks, here’s the best part:

Just a reminder: You were plucked out of obscurity by a team of gay men, gay men who not only believed in you and gave you the chance of a lifetime but treated you with loving kindness and respect — the same gay men you discriminated against by publicly supporting Chick-fil-A. You were chosen to star in the show Legally Blonde specifically by the director/choreographer, who is a gay man. The associate choreographer and vocal coach who helped you win the reality show you were on are two gay men. A few of the Broadway show’s producers (the ones who paid you) are gay. Your costume designer is a gay man, as is the designer of the wigs and makeup you wore. You were taught the choreography and put into the Broadway show by a gay man, and you were supported and made to feel safe and part of the Broadway community by the many gay people in your cast. These people are not only my coworkers, Bailey, but, more importantly, they are my friends. After your time on Broadway (surrounded by gay people), you did not run screaming home, where the hills have eyes. You stayed here, in Sodom and Gomorrah. You auditioned and continued to make friends and work with — guess what — more gay people. We invited you into our homes and offered you a place at our table. You stayed for dinner, ate all the food, even stuck around for dessert, and now vomited it all up in our faces. Your website describes you as “sweet, kind, caring”; perhaps you should add “unless you’re gay.”

To read the full letter click below:

John Carroll: Gays Giveth and Gays Taketh Away: An Open Letter to Bailey Hanks.

Chick-Fil-A-Holes; The Dan Cathy Butt Plug Scandal!!!

I fortunately don’t have to boycott Chick-fil-A, I live in Europe and I don’t eat fast-food anyway; But if I did it would not be because of company President Dan Cathy’s comments on gay marriage. I would boycott Chick-fil-A because Dan Cathy used profits from Chick-fil-A to donate five million dollars to organizations that advocate:

1. Criminalizing gay people

2. Denying gay people the ability to serve in the military

3. Depicting gay people as pedophiles

4. Making sexual orientation grounds to fire an employee

5. Denying gay parents access to their own children

6: Denying children of gay couples the protections derived from having both parents recognized

and the list goes on.

Yet again, gay activists are making the same old mistake. Playing defence.

“Please, oh please Christian Right, please like us on Facebook!”

“We’re not so bad, look at the scientific studies!”

“We promise to be good, all we want is to get married and behave just like you!”

My message to Dan Cathy and the rest of the Chick-fil-A-Holes is go Fuck Yourselves. Get your pathetic little minds out of my business. I’m not interested in your sex-lives or the contracts you sign with your toothless wives regarding which one of you gets the trailer when you divorce to marry yet another cousin. I’d appreciate an equal disinterest in my sex-life and whatever contracts I sign. I don’t give a flying fairy who you marry. Go live your own lives and stop sticking your noses in other people’s business. Free, tax-paying LGBT citizens do not need your approval to live our own lives.

The Homophobia Song

I think I forgot to post this a few months back… anyway, here it is:

American Family Association decrys the “Big Gay” Machine | W. Thomas Adkins

The American Family Association has created an online “sign the letter” form where people who believe that the LGBT community should not be treated with dignity, respect and equality can show their support of Chik-fil-A’s anti-equality stance (hat tip to Good As You).

Full text:

American Family Association decrys the “Big Gay” Machine | W. Thomas Adkins.

Could someone just PLEASE send these people a box of dildos so they can distract themselves and attempt sex lives of their very own???

Ten Things You CAN Say to a Trans Person (Reblogged from TRANIFESTO) « dominicdemeyn

This does not happen everyday! Freshly pressed LGBTQ issues!!!

Thank you Dominic!!!

Ten Things You CAN Say to a Trans Person (Reblogged from TRANIFESTO) « dominicdemeyn.

Cuando ser gay era delito | Metrópoli | elmundo.es

Cuando ser gay era delito | Metrópoli | elmundo.es.

Ukraine Bill to Prohibit Walking Whilst Gay?

Ukraine’s legislature is about to vote a brand new bill into law that will make it illegal to be gay or lesbian in public. President Viktor Yanukovych has the power to stop the law, but has chosen to stay silent on the growing anti-gay sentiment.

The President says a new alliance with the European Union is his #1 Priority.  As officials from Ukraine prepare to meet with an EU delegation on human rights this Friday, it’s time to finally bring this issue to light and force the President Yanukovych to speak out against these laws.

Will you take one moment to call on President Yanukovych to condemn the laws before his meeting on Friday?  Every single voice of opposition makes a real difference.

Sign the petition at All Out!!!

Dharun Ravi Sentenced to 30 days. Tyler Clementi Case.

ABC News Feed

Victim impact statements were heart-wrenching. The prosecutor gave a very impressive speech on the fairness of the trial. She made a compelling case for incarceration and interesting comments on the importance of bias intimidation charges.

Ravi’s defence attorney played to classic homophobia. First he made light of the events and even ended up mentioning gay anal sex. Ravi’s father’s statement was insulting. He mentioned Ravi did not live in a homophobic household, but went on to twice mention “lobby groups” with an agenda. I presume he can only be referring to the Gay Agenda.

I take what happened very seriously and not as a prude. As most people who read this blog know, I once did porn. I knew what was happening, I knew I was being filmed, I know people can walk into shops all around the world and buy videos of me engaging in sexual acts; But the idea that a private moment of my life, an emotional moment could be exposed to the world without my consent is unimaginable. It’s a form of robbery, it’s a form of rape.

Last year I had 30 days of community service for having a 0.6 alcohol level whilst driving. Martha Stewart: 1 year and a half in jail for lying to investigators. Dharun Ravi gets 30 days and 3 years probation for invading one of the most private moments human beings have. Had he been the girl next door, I can’t help but think people (including the judge) would have very different attitude to the events. A pale, nerdy, gay boy isn’t someone everyone can relate to. If it was the judge’s daughter, he’d think differently.

Dr. Robert L. Spitzer, Noted Psychiatrist, Apologizes for Study on Gay ‘Cure’ – NYTimes.com

Sleepless nights led to clarity for Dr. Robert L. Spitzer. The 80-year-old pioneering psychiatrist and researcher has decided to recant one of his most controversial pieces of work, research he conducted in 2003 that supported the use of reparative therapy to “cure” homosexuality. A recent World Health Organization report called the study “a serious threat to the health and well-being–even the lives–of affected people.” In a letter to be published in a research journal this month, Spitzer writes that he owes “the gay community an apology.” Spitzer has said that regrets for the study, which he now sees as a poorly conceived jab at orthodox research, have remained with him over the past eleven years.

Read it at The New York Times

Dr. Robert L. Spitzer, Noted Psychiatrist, Apologizes for Study on Gay ‘Cure’ – NYTimes.com.

(My) Recycled Intellectuality. Umberto Eco on Political Correctness

We’re going out to lunch… and when we return, if sufficiently sober, I’ll take on the translation of an Umberto Eco article for L’Espresso (arrogant individual I am.) If you already read Italian (as Angry Ricky probably does- he mentioned Eco a couple of days ago, that’s what reminded me of this article.) Here’s the original. Even if you speak Italian, you may not understand the title as it’s Milanese slang. I remember paying eight euros for a coca-cola in Milan- OUTRAGEOUS. Anyway, there’s no direct translation for the title, but its sentiment is basically bloody idiot. Ostrega means oyster, comparable to the Castillian Spanish exclamation hostia. Pistola means gun. You do the math. The subtitle is “repertoire of gentle offence”.

Pistola dell’ostrega 

Repertorio di offese gentili
Umberto Eco 

Il Politically Correct è un vero e proprio movimento d’idee nato nell’università americana, d’ispirazione liberal e radical, e quindi di sinistra, volto al riconoscimento del multiculturalismo, per ridurre alcuni radicati vizi linguistici che stabilivano linee di discriminazione nei confronti di qualsiasi minoranza. E dunque si è iniziato a dire ‘blacks’ e poi ‘Afro Americans’ invece di ‘negri’, ‘gay’ invece dei mille e notissimi altri appellativi sprezzanti riservati agli omosessuali. Naturalmente questa campagna per la purificazione del linguaggio ha prodotto il proprio fondamentalismo, sino ai casi più vistosi in cui alcune femministe avevano proposto di non dire più ‘history’ che per via del pronome ‘his’ faceva pensare che la storia fosse ‘di lui’, bensì ‘herstory’, storia di lei – ovviamente ignorando l’etimologia greco-latina del termine, che non implica alcun riferimento di genere.
Però la tendenza ha assunto anche aspetti neoconservatori o francamente reazionari. Se tu decidi di chiamare le persone in carrozzella non più handicappati e neppure disabili, ma ‘diversamente abili’, e poi non gli costruisci le rampe d’accesso ai luoghi pubblici, evidentemente hai ipocritamente rimosso la parola, ma non il problema. E del pari si dica della sostituzione di disoccupato con ‘nullafacente a tempo indefinito’ o di licenziato con ‘in transizione programmata tra cambiamenti di carriera’. Chissà perché un banchiere non si vergogna della sua definizione e non insiste per essere chiamato operatore nel campo del risparmio. Se ti cambiano il nome è per dimenticare che qualcosa non funziona nella cosa stessa.
Su questi e infiniti altri problemi si intrattiene Edoardo Crisafulli con il suo libro ‘Il politicamente corretto e la libertà linguistica’, che mette a nudo tutte le contraddizioni, i pro e i contro di questa tendenza – e tra l’altro è anche molto divertente. Leggendolo però mi veniva da riflettere al caso curioso del nostro paese. Mentre altrove esplodeva e si diffondeva il Politically Correct da noi si è sempre più sviluppato il Politicamente Scorretto. Se una volta i nostri uomini politici, leggendo su un foglietto, dicevano: “Emerge che si consente che, a una politica delle convergenze, ancorché parallele, si preferirebbe una scelta asintotica che eliminasse anche singoli punti d’intersezione”, oggi si preferisce dire: “Dialogo? In culo a quegli sporchi figli di puttana!”. È vero che anche un tempo nei circoli paleocomunisti si usava bollare l’avversario come ‘mosca cocchiera’ e in parlamento, durante le risse, si facevano scelte lessicali più incontinenti di quelle di uno scaricatore del porto, ma erano territori per così dire delimitati, ove si accettava un costume – come peraltro avveniva nei casini di venerata memoria, dove le signore non erano più verbalmente controllate di un parlamentare. Oggi invece la tecnica dell’insulto è teletrasmessa, segno di fede inconcussa nei valori della democrazia.
Si era iniziato probabilmente con Bossi, il cui celodurismo alludeva ovviamente a un celofloscismo altrui, e l’appellativo di ‘Berluskaz’ era inequivocabile, ma la cosa è dilagata. Stefano Bartezzaghi, nella sua rubrica del ‘Venerdì di Repubblica’, cita dei giochi d’insulto oggi in circolazione, ma a livello tutto sommato bonario. Per cui, onde contribuire anch’io all’addolcimento del Politicamente Scorretto italiano, dopo aver consultato una serie di dizionari anche dialettali, mi permetto di suggerire alcune espressioni tutto sommato bonaccione e gentili per insultare l’avversario, quali verbigrazia: pistola dell’ostrega, papaciugo, imbolsito, crapapelata, piffero, marocchino, pivellone, ciulandario, morlacco, badalucco, pischimpirola, tarabuso, balengu, piciu, cacasotto, malmostoso, lavativo, magnasapone, tonto, allocco, vaterclòs, caprone, magnavongole, zanzibar, bidone, ciocco, bartolomeo, mona, perdabàall, sguincio, merlo, dibensò, spaccamerda, tapiro, belinone, tamarro, burino, lucco, lingera, bernardo, lasagnone, vincenzo, babbiasso e/o babbione, grand e gross ciula e baloss, saletabacchi, fregnone, lenza, scricchianespuli, cagone, giocondo, asinone, impiastro, ciarlatano, cecè, salame, testadirapa, facciadimerda, farfallone, tanghero, cazzone, magnafregna, pulcinella, zozzone, scassapalle, mangiapaneatradimento, gonzo, bestione, buzzicone, cacacammisa, sfrappolato, puzzone, coatto, gandùla, pagnufli, cichinisio, brighella, tombino, pituano, pirla, carampana, farlocco, flanellone, ambroeus, bigàtt, flippato, fricchettone, gabolista, gaglioffo, bietolone, gadano, fighetta, blacboc, imbranato, balordo, grèbano, piattola, impagliato, asparagio, babbuino, casinaro, bagolone, cucuzzaro, accattone, barabba, loffio, tappo, caporale, toni, macaco, baluba, pappone, pizipinturro, polentone, bonga, quaquaraquà, tarpàno, radeschi, peracottaro, ciculaté, mandruccone, paraculo, fanigottone, scamorza, scricio, mezzasega, rocchettée, pataccaro, pinguino, margniflone, mortodesonno, sbragone, mortadella, scorreggione, pappamolla, furfantello, scioccherello, stolto, sventato e biricchino.

Update: 6:12 PM

Back from lunch and overly sober, so I’ve poured myself a glass of rioja. I complained about the price of a coca-cola in Milan a few hours ago, but discovered it’s possible to pay 8 euros for water right here… It’s called Bezoya, and actually comes in a lovely glass bottle- which I brought home. Now I don’t know what I’m going to do with it. In totally unrelated news. We have a new, large television. As Mike was driving yesterday he saw a big sign that said, if you buy a TV at Media Markt (that’s a German chain of electronics stores all over the EU)- bring in your old TV and we will give you 2 euros off for every kilogram your old TV weighs. He loves that sort of thing and what made him even happier was that we had his late mother’s GIANT old TV in the basement. We left it there because it takes three men to move it and we were too lazy to ever dispose of it. Anyway, our giant new flatscreen only cost 120 euros after the discount, which is about 150 dollars. I told Mike that media Markt probably got these TV’s on ebay from the London rioters last year. Was it last year or this year? Back to the point- here’s Umberto Eco:

“Political Correctness is a true and proper movement. It was born in American universities of liberal and radical inspiration, therefore a movement of the Left, with the aim of acknowledging multiculturalism and reducing some of the ingrained linguistic vices that established lines of discrimination confronting various minorities. The movement began by saying “blacks” and later “African Americans” instead of “ni—r”. Then, “gay” instead of the thousands of other notorious options reserved for disparaging homosexuals.

Naturally, this campaign for the purification of language has produced a genuine fundamentalism, which has led to the notable case in which some feminists have proposed to no longer say “history” since it begins with the pronoun “his”, as they thought this meant that history was “his”. Instead they propose we say “herstory” – her (hi)story – obviously ignoring the Greco-Latin etymology which has no gender implications.

However, the tendency has also assumed neo-conservative, or frankly, reactionary aspects. If you decide to no longer call people in wheelchairs handicapped or even disabled, but “differently-abled” and then you do not construct access ramps in public places, it is evident that you have hypocritically removed the word but not the problem. And the same is true if you substitute saying “indefinitely unoccupied” for fired or “in a program of transition to change careers” for unemployed. Who knows why a banker isn’t ashamed of his title and doesn’t insist on being called an operator in the field of savings. If it’s not working, changing the name won’t fix it.

On these and an infinity of other problems, Edoardo Crisafulli amuses his readers in his book “The Politically Correct and Linguistic Liberty”, which strips naked all of these contradictions. He takes on both sides, pro and con, and is always very entertaining. Reading it, however, I came to reflect on the curious case of our country (Italy). While Political Correctness exploded elsewhere, in our case it was diffused and instead we are always developing more and more Political Incorrectness. If, at one time, one would read a newspaper and a politician would say: “As a politics of convergence is emerging, one would prefer an asymptotic choice that eliminated single points of intersection”; today he prefers to say: “Dialogue? To Hell with that dirty son of a bitch!”

It is true that at one time in old Communist circles they used to label the adversary  “horseflies” and in speaking during meetings, they might have chosen to use a lexicon more insulting than that of a sailor, but that was in a time when there were no limits to what one could say – it was accepted as an affectation – as was once the case in the gentlemen’s clubs of venerated memory – where the gentlemen were not verbally inhibited. Today, instead, the technique of an insult is televised, a sign of unconcious faith in the valor of democracy.

It probably began with Bossi(Umberto Bossi of the right-wing Northern League)), in which his manly hardness obviously alludes to the softness of other people, and the appellation of “Berluskaz(Berlusconi + Cazzo)” was unmistakable but the thing spread widely. Stefano Bartezzaghi, writing under the name Venerdi di Repubblica, cites the play of insults today in circulation, but in good fun, all things considered.

Therefore, I too must contribute to the sweetness of Politically Incorrect Italian, and as I have consulted a series of dictionaries and dialects, permit me to suggest some polite and good-natured expressions with which to insult your enemy, graceful words:  pistola dell’ostrega, papaciugo, imbolsito, crapapelata, piffero, marocchino, pivellone, ciulandario, morlacco, badalucco, pischimpirola…

Family Research Institute Chief: Obama’s Probably Gay, Wants Our Kids To Be Gay Too / Queerty

Today in the world of cuckoo statements from heads of certified hate groups: Family Research Institute chief Paul Cameron claims that Obama has probably “participated in homosexual acts,” notes Right Wing Watch.

Cameron also says Obama’s now complicit with a movement that wants “every little boy and girl” to give homosexuality a try. Said Cameron on Crosstalk, a Christian radio show:

Homosexuality is the one sin, or the one habit, that is 24/7. It is homosexuality all the time. And actually, while I’m not sure about the claims by the various people who have reported that Obama has at least participated at times with them in homosexual acts, this certainly lends some credence.

Ah, yes, “the various people.” The Various People are always spreading weird gossip about me, too. Like, that I totally cheated on my boyfriend with that other dude on Fire Island last summer. And that they definitely saw me at McDonald’s getting two Big Macs the other day. The Various People are always trying to take me down.

Full story here: 

Family Research Institute Chief: Obama’s Probably Gay, Wants Our Kids To Be Gay Too / Queerty.

Qualitative vs. Descriptive. Where politically correct goes wrong (in America.)

This is an issue all of us hear about often, usually there’s a sportscaster involved (don’t ask me why, I don’t know)- but unfortunately these incidents are rarely scrutinized logically. Never was it so clear to me as before the Beijing Olympics. The Spanish basketball team took a promotional picture before going to China. This is the picture. Why are they all touching their eyes? They’re pulling them back to emulate Asian eyes. When they did this, they had no idea it would cause controversy- not in Spain, not in China, but in America. A Chinese-American association released a statement saying they should apologize for the offence. In response a Chinese-Spanish association released a statement saying the gesture was descriptive and playful rather than (negatively) qualitative.  What did the Chinese-Spanish Association mean? That for the picture to be deemed offensive, one would have to believe that Asian eyes are inferior to European eyes. The Chinese government agreed and put out a statement along the same lines. So what’s going on in America and why is the perception so different? It’s different for two monumental reasons. The first is post-colonial race relations. Countries that are made up of large immigrant populations face a hierarchization based on a variety of factors which include seniority of residency. Every socio-cultural/ethnic/national/religious group that arrives in new lands finds their minority rejected by the groups who were already there. This happened to Jews, the Chinese, Italians, the Irish, Puerto Ricans, Mexicans… and the list goes on. The initial rejection creates an equal opposite force in members of the minority. They then embrace characteristics which are particular to the group with more gusto. They flip the tables, what was used to embarrass them becomes their pride. We in the LGBT community used the same method by turning our gay-shame into our gay-pride. In America this has created an unusual phenomena. There are people whose families have been in the country for many generations, but who identify themselves as Italian-American, Irish-American or African-American. This does not occur in Europe. A Frenchman whose parents were born in Italy does not call himself Italian-French. A Spaniard whose parents were born in Portugal, doesn’t call himself Luso-Hispano. Former President Sarkozy has a Hungarian father and a Greek mother, yet he’s never been referred to as anything but French. A black man born in the Netherlands is Dutch, he’s also black, there’s no allusion to his race/ethnicity in his national identity. The idea that a European identify himself according to ethnicity of his ancestors of generations ago would seem absurd (and possibly offensive) to most of us. It would lead to me saying I’m Occitane or from the Kingdom of Córdoba.

Continental European history has allowed for an entirely different approach to ethnic/race relations. Cadiz, the capital of the province in which I live, is described in classical literature as having been founded in the year 1104 BC, although archaeological records only put it in the 9th century before Christ. It was founded by the Phoenicians who used it as an outpost for trade with the Tartessians, a people who lived in south-western Spain. Around 500BC, Cadiz fell to the control of Hannibal’s Carthage. In 206 BC, the Roman general, Scipio the Great, took the city. Cadiz became the third greatest city of the Roman empire, preceded only by Rome and Padua. After six centuries and the decline of the Roman Empire, the Visigoths took over, but 140 years later Justinian took it, making it part of the Byzantine Empire. In the year 572 Leovigild reconquered the city for the Visigoth Kingdom. The Moors arrived in the year 711 and ruled until 1262 when King Alphonso of Castille expelled them from this part of Spain. Christopher Columbus set sail on his second and fourth voyages from the Cadiz port.

Spain hasn’t enforced interracial marriage bans since the times of Isabelle of Castille and Fernando of Aragon, and the bans were more to do with religious wars than race. The Portuguese encouraged intermarriage in the colonies. French interracial marriage bans lasted from 1792 to the 1830′s and were rarely enforced. I’m leaving Germans out of this whole story, well, you know why- they’re special. So this is where I finally get to the point, European sensibilities are accustomed to variety. We live with perspective in the background of our everyday lives. Not far from where I live is a city called Ronda and its Roman Aqueduct.

A bit further away is the Alhambra Palace, built by the Moorish Nasrid Dynasty.

In practice, (physically) living with diversity has disallowed the oversimplification of cultural/ethnic identity. Most Europeans are the result of millenia of conquests and cultural inter-mingling. The approach to race and ethnicity isn’t (for the most part) one of hierarchy, although that has existed in quite obvious ways in certain pockets of majoritarily (not a real word) Anglo and Saxon populations. So who is right and who is wrong? They’re both right and wrong. The Chinese American who was offended interpreted the gesture in the context of his life experience in a society that inferiorized (not sure if that’s a word but I’m going with it anyway) Asian eyes. The Chinese in Spain and China didn’t/don’t come at it from the same perspective. These fundamental differences in perception have turned the well intentioned concepts behind politically correct speech on their heads. A neutral word like black (merely descriptive) was substituted for a term that lays weight on ancestral race, African American. That reminds me of a caste system. It takes away individual descriptive identity and substitutes it for historical heredity. The son of a slave is a slave. The son of a Baron is a Baron. We see this concept taken to the extreme with the cast of the Jersey Shore. Very little of their identity has anything at all to do with Italy. They’re Jerseyans, they’re Americans. They happen to (perhaps) have some Italian ancestors- yet they define themselves, first and foremost, as Italian Americans.

This form of categorization doesn’t assist social integration, it does the opposite. This line of political correctness has no reasonable logic to support it. I see this lack of logic and imagination now starting to infiltrate various areas of public awareness. Not long ago Blair’s government tried to pass a law that (amongst other things) prohibited jokes about religion- fortunately it didn’t pass and a very watered down version of it was adopted instead. I think oversensitivity is being taken to the extreme, in detriment of rational thought.  Of course, I have this perspective based on my own nationality/ethnicity/race, which is the only one I could have being me- have I missed something?

Genetic Queerty?

My great-great grandfather, Adolphe, was known as a provocateur… at least that’s the word they chose back then. Here, as a teenager, he poses in his mother’s cape, stole and hat. It was the 1890′s. I guess 1890′s Paris must have been quite fun. Had I attempted something like this, a framed photograph would probably not have been the result. I’m not really insinuating he was LGB or T. For most people of that time, we’ll probably never know. But I like the picture anyway, because even if he wasn’t LGBT, he must have been extremely comfortable with his sexuality to allow himself to do it.

He then fought in World War I

Never quite recovered from his injuries and died at the age of 41.

James Lankford, GOP Rep, Opposes Laws Against Gay Employee Discrimination

Queer-Landia Exclusive: Interview with Jane Svoboda aka The Nebraska Cat Lady | Queer Landia

Today I’ve taken my Pink Agenda over to Queer Landia, but it’s still just as rosy as ever! Here’s my interview with the crazy Nebraska woman made famous when her homophobic rant went viral.

Queer-Landia Exclusive: Interview with Jane Svoboda aka The Nebraska Cat Lady | Queer Landia.

Davey Wavey, the unlikely activist, hits a home-run!!!

Gay blogger extraordinaire, Davey Wavey, put together this fantastic video in an effort to dispel LGBT stereotypes. Watch it! It’s short, sweet and wonderful, all the participants are real people.

Mitt Romney’s prep school classmates recall pranks, but also troubling incidents – The Washington Post

From the Washington Post: In an English class, Gary Hummel, who was a closeted gay student at the time, recalled that his efforts to speak out in class were punctuated with Romney shouting, “Atta girl!”

Mitt Romney’s prep school classmates recall pranks, but also troubling incidents – The Washington Post.

Explaining the North Carolina Vote: They were afraid of the Sugar Dandies.


If you’re in America (and not part of a pro anti gay marriage campaign) you probably haven’t seen an entire British audience cheering on the Sugar Dandies. A gay couple. A pair of middle-aged men who have been together for 16 years. They’ve been married for five. Soren, who’s Scandinavian, is a psychologist. Bradley, who’s American, is a theatrical manager. Together they are the Sugar Dandies and what they do is  come up with questionable ballroom dancing routines. The objective of their routines is obvious. What they’ve aimed to do all along is destroy the traditional marriages of people in North Carolina.

They first met in 1996 at a Gay Chorus Festival in Tampa, Florida. They claim it was love at first sight- but North Carolinians know it was not so. It’s not that Soren wanted to be with Bradley and Bradley with Soren. The couple realized that what they felt for each other, wasn’t actually about them- at all. Their relationship was about other people’s marriages, primordially about the marriages of members of the Christian Right who reside in North Carolina.

So their plot began. Bradley joined Soren in London. They decided ballroom dancing was the perfect gay-tool to attack traditional marriage. Their second gay-tool was their taste in clothing. The third, cheesy photographs. Their coup de grâce against traditional marriage was their appearance on Britain’s Got Talent. Simon Cowell immediately knew what they were up to. They were trying to question his heterosexuality. He rolled his eyes in an effort to expose them and prove his hetero-credentials.

The problem was that David Walliams was also on the panel of  judges. If you’ve watched his show, Little Britain, you’re aware he’s also trying to destroy traditional marriage by making straight-married-men fall in love with Matt Lucas who plays a character called The Only Gay in the Village. You can see from Matt’s picture here on the right how far Walliams will go to normalize homosexuality. The Only Gay in the Village character is obviously designed to look like the average North Carolinian. Men from that state are supposed to look at him and think: “That could be me! I’d look just like that if I wore rubber shorts and a stretch lace top! I’m going to leave my cousin, who’s also my wife, and sign up for a homosexual lifestyle!”

You’re probably wondering how I know all of this, so I have an admission to make. I too am a part of Soren and Bradley’s campaign to destroy traditional marriage. When Mike and I decided to live together it had nothing to do with wanting to be together. Our real aim was to call into question the heterosexual marriages of North-Carolinians. When our lawyer drew up a contract making Mike my universal heir and me his universal heir, that had nothing to do with our lives and our property. It was a move designed to de-stabilize North Carolinian heterosexual marriages. That picture of Mike pointing at me at a dinner party… He was actually asking me how many hetero-marriages (in North Carolina) I was able to destroy that evening. I explained to him I had been eating and then telling people about the Zmurko I’d bought- but I had my eye on someone whose hetero- marriage might be threatened

by

our marriage…

Click here to sign a petition to repeal Amendment One

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 644 other followers