The Pink Agendist

by E.B. de Mas, reachable at: pink.agendist@yahoo.com

Tag: civil rights

NY plaintiff: Gay benefits ‘bigger than marriage’ | WashingtonExaminer.com

NEW YORK (AP) — At age 83, Edith Windsor gets plenty of compliments for her courage to take on the federal government in a landmark case that has put attitudes about gay America squarely before the Supreme Court.

But the Philadelphia-born former IBM executive scoffs at how much gumption was necessary to go to court at a time when society seems to be getting more conscious that a closed-minded approach to differences in sexuality appears to do more harm than good.

“The world has progressed,” Windsor says. “At the beginning of World War II, they really did think we had horns.”

Read it here:

NY plaintiff: Gay benefits ‘bigger than marriage’ | WashingtonExaminer.com.

UGANDA ARREST ME TOO I am GAY | O-blog-dee-o-blog-da

UGANDA ARREST ME TOO I AM GAY

Melanie Nathan, Lawyer and human rights activist and Kristina Lapinski, Filmmaker, from GAY U.S.A. the Movie participate in the GetEQUAL UGANDA ARREST ME TOO Campaign.

There are two things the U.S.A. LGBT and supportive community can do to help Ugandan LGBT community while the Anti-Homosexuality Bill (Kill the Gays Bill) is about to pass Uganda’s Parliament:

1. Sign the Petition at SIGN THE PETITION HERE:

UGANDA ARREST ME TOO I am GAY | O-blog-dee-o-blog-da.

Putting the ‘jab’ in ‘hijab’: Girls beat up Iran cleric when he tells them to cover up – CNN.com

Putting the ‘jab’ in ‘hijab’: Girls beat up Iran cleric when he tells them to cover up – CNN.com.

Chris Kluwe: An Open Letter to Emmett Burns

Baltimore Ravens linebacker Brendon Ayanbadejo has voiced his support for a Maryland ballot initiative that would legalize same-sex marriage in the state. In response, Maryland state delegate Emmett C. Burns, Jr. (D-Baltimore) wrote a letter to Ravens owner Steve Bisciotti urging him to “inhibit such expressions from your employee.” In the open letter below, Minnesota Vikings punter Chris Kluwe responds to Burns.

Chris Kluwe: An Open Letter to Emmett Burns.

Anti-Gay Fallacy-Fest: Argumentum ad antiquitatem & Argumentum ad numerum; Appeals to tradition & majority.

Note: Not just anti-gay!!!

Argumentum ad antiquitatem

(the argument to antiquity & tradition).

This is a very common fallacious argument. It implies that because some policy or behaviour has been practised historically that means it is correct and acceptable.

In the gay debate it comes in the form of: “Gay marriage has never existed” with the added implication: and therefore it shouldn’t exist.

Issues:

1. Tradition does not quantify something as good or bad. Slavery existed for most of our history, so did the subjugation of women regarding voting, property rights and even child-custody. I imagine no one would argue lack of equality is a positive aspect of any society because it’s traditional. There are many utterly modern ideas that are a reflection of compassion, logic and evolved thinking as those introduced and adopted by the  EU convention on Human Rights. Only signed after the horrors of World War II.

Argumentum ad numerum (appeal to numbers). This fallacy is the attempt to prove something by showing how many people think that it’s true.

“The majority of Americans disapprove of gay marriage”

But, no matter how many people believe something, that doesn’t necessarily make it true or right. Once humanity believed (wrongly) the earth was immobile. The Catholic church even persecuted you if you dared disagree. Humanity also supported slavery and burnt witches. Our response to this fallacy is usually “but attitudes are changing” or “now over 70% of people under 34 support gay marriage”- by not exposing the fallacious line of reasoning we allow the perpetuation of the illogical thought process. To effect real change in mindset we must show people their thinking pattern is defective and perhaps they won’t adopt fallacious lines so readily in future.

 As it’s fallacy fest, which fallacy do you think is being portrayed below?

Shane L. Windmeyer: Colleges Rally to Kick Chick-fil-A Off Campus

Shane touches a very interesting topic which concerns the long-game.

Gallup polls suggest that young adults between the ages of 18 and 34 are overwhelmingly in favor of LGBT rights, and 76 percent of them support legalizing marriage for gay and lesbian couples. The Higher Education Research Institute’s annual Freshman Survey corroborates this support for same-sex marriage and also the fact that three quarters of college students today support adoption by gay and lesbian couples.”

From a commercial perspective Huckabee’s appreciation day was a one off. How many appreciation days would it take to outweigh the loss of permanent customers. The Crazy-Christians were, one presumes, already customers- I can’t imagine the numbers could stack up positively in the long run with an entire new generation who refuses to support the marginalization, exclusion and persecution of the LGBT community.

Read it at the HuffPo:

Shane L. Windmeyer: Colleges Rally to Kick Chick-fil-A Off Campus.

A Gay Actor’s Response to Bret Easton Ellis | Queer Landia

Mike speaks:

QUEERLANDIA EXCLUSIVE: A Gay Actor’s Response to Bret Easton Ellis | Queer Landia.

The Christian Right’s Fourberie; The False Dilemma Fallacy; Who Said Gays Don’t Support the Biblical Definition of Marriage?

As was revealed by Chick-Fil-A’s Dan Cathy in his recent comments, the Christian Right is yet again trying to coin another anti-gay mantra. Like many before it, it’s a logical fallacy. It seems even the fanatically religious have realized that the it’s not Adam & Steve line has gotten old, apart from being puerile and implying the law should adhere to a single religion contravening the basic principles of liberty outlined in constitutional democracies. This anti-logical dance is not a new one. Conservatives ordinarily twist language (badly) to defend the more flagitious (fourberie and now flagitious, man, the guy who writes this stuff is pretentious) and destructive aspects of their ideology. Their leaders are skilled at these manipulations and they depend on the ignorance of their followers for these tactics to succeed. How many times have I heard people say it’s freedom of religion not freedom from religion. That is by all means an attempt to deceive by playing semantics (badly) since logically, freedom of religion is interchangeable with freedom from religion.

When Mr. Cathy and his ilk say “We believe in the biblical definition of marriage” they are trying to deceive listeners by presenting the False Dilemma fallacy. They fail to mention that the Gay Community supports the biblical definition of marriage for people who adhere to the bible. We also support the Catholic definition of marriage for people who adhere to the Catholic interpretation of biblical marriage, one that precludes divorce and condemns birth control. We support the Muslim definition of marriage for Muslims; The Hindu definition for Hindus; the Mormon definition for Mormons and the Jewish definition for Jews. The false dilemma fallacy fraudulently presents the issue as an either/or when no such choice has to be made. Different types of marriage have co-existed in the world for millennia and can continue to do so.

The artifice in all of this is to make the oppressor look like the oppressed, and that’s a method Right Wing extremists have been using for centuries. Professor Agre from UCLA describes the phenomena beautifully: ” … conservative rhetors have been systematically mapping the language that has historically been used to describe the aristocracy and the traditional authorities that serve it, and have twisted those words into terms for liberals. This tactic has the dual advantage of both attacking the aristocracies’ opponents and depriving them of the words that they have used to attack aristocracy.

A simple example is the term “race-baiting”. In the Nexis database, uses of “race-baiting” undergo a sudden switch in the early 1990′s. Before then, “race-baiting” referred to racists. Afterward, it referred in twisted way to people who oppose racism. What happened is simple: conservative rhetors, tired of the political advantage that liberals had been getting from their use of that word, took it away from them.

A more complicated example is the word “racist”. Conservative rhetors have tried to take this word away as well by constantly coming up with new ways to stick the word onto liberals and their policies. For example they have referred to affirmative action as “racist”. This is false; it is an attempt to destroy language. Racism is the notion that one race is intrinsically better than another. Affirmative action is arguably discriminatory, as a means of partially offsetting discrimination in other places and times, but it is not racist. Many conservative rhetors have even stuck the word “racist” on people just because they oppose racism. The notion seems to be that these people addressed themselves to the topic of race, and the word “racist” is sort of an adjective relating somehow to race. In any event this too is an attack on language.”

Biblical Definitions of Marriage for Dummies

Democratic Party to add gay marriage to platform | The Ticket – Yahoo! News

Democratic Party to add gay marriage to platform | The Ticket – Yahoo! News.

Please Sign This Petition!!! 17-year-old sexual assault victim could face charges for tweeting names of attackers

17-year-old sexual assault victim could face charges for tweeting names of attackers

A Kentucky girl who was sexually assaultedcould face contempt of court charges after she tweeted the names of her juvenile attackers.

Savannah Dietrich, the 17-year-old victim, was frustrated by a plea deal reached late last month by the two boys who assaulted her, and took to Twitter to expose them–violating a court order to keep their names confidential.

“There you go, lock me up,” Dietrich tweeted after naming the perpetrators. “I’m not protecting anyone that made my life a living Hell.” Her Twitter account has since been closed.

Attorneys for the attackers asked a Jefferson District Court judge to hold Dietrich in contempt for lashing out on Twitter. She could face up to 180 days in jail and a $500 fine if convicted. The boys have yet to be sentenced for the August 2011 attack.

“So many of my rights have been taken away by these boys,” Dietrich told Louisville’s Courier-Journal. “I’m at the point, that if I have to go to jail for my rights, I will do it. If they really feel it’s necessary to throw me in jail for talking about what happened to me as opposed to throwing these boys in jail for what they did to me, then I don’t understand justice.”

Dietrich was assaulted by the pair after passing out at a party. They later shared photos of the assault with friends.

“For months, I cried myself to sleep,” Dietrich said. “I couldn’t go out in public places.”

On June 26, the boys pleaded guilty to first-degree sexual abuse and misdemeanor voyeurism. Terms of their plea agreement were not released.

“They got off very easy,” Dietrich, who says she was unaware of the plea agreement before it was announced in court, said in her interview with the newspaper.

“They said I can’t talk about it or I’ll be locked up,” Dietrich tweeted after hearing, according to the paper. “So I’m waiting for them to read this and lock me up.”

“[Protecting rapists] is more important than getting justice for the victim in Louisville,” she added.

A hearing for the contempt of court charge is scheduled for July 30. Attorneys for Dietrich want it open to the media, while the boys lawyers want it closed.

Both the Gannett-owned Courier-Journal and Dietrich’s attorneys “have filed motions to open the proceedings, arguing she has a First Amendment right to speak about what happened in her case,” the newspaper said.

An online petition asking the judge to throw out the charges against Dietrich, launched Saturday, has already accumulated hundreds of signatures.

“[She] should not be legally barred from talking about what happened to her,” Gregg Leslie, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, told the Associated Press. “That’s a wide-ranging restraint on speech.”

To Sign the Petition Click Here

Ten Things You CAN Say to a Trans Person (Reblogged from TRANIFESTO) « dominicdemeyn

This does not happen everyday! Freshly pressed LGBTQ issues!!!

Thank you Dominic!!!

Ten Things You CAN Say to a Trans Person (Reblogged from TRANIFESTO) « dominicdemeyn.

Tell A Bully That They Suck, And Show Them You Don’t Give A F–k by Bill McMorrow

“Bullying is a hot topic in today’s world. No, not the Hot Topic at the mall where you buy all your body glitter and nose rings, you slut. I mean a hot topic as in a widely discussed issue.

Face it, kids are mean. Not necessarily on purpose, but mean is mean regardless of intent. They’re even meaner when they come in packs, like wolves or cigarettes. Back in simpler times bullies just did their dickhead thing at school and then went back to their shitty homes where they were probably bullied by their shitty parents. It’s a vicious cycle”

 

Click here for the full text:

Tell A Bully That They Suck, And Show Them You Don’t Give A Fuck 

I’m over Anderson Cooper; My new crush is François Picard.

If you’re in the UK/EU and have Sky TV, he’s on channel 513 every afternoon at 7:30 Paris time (6:30 London time).

He’s got the eyes of a puppy. I discovered him a while back at which time he substituted Anderson Copper as the fantasy husband in the fantasy life that goes on solely in my head. He’s a spectacular interviewer and can moderate a debate like no other.

BTW, I don’t think he’s gay, but I don’t care.

Anderson Cooper: ‘The fact is, I’m gay’ | The Lookout – Yahoo! News

“Anderson Cooper has confirmed what most people in the media world and New York already knew: he is gay.

“The fact is, I’m gay,” Cooper wrote in an email to Daily Beast blogger Andrew Sullivan. “Always have been, always will be, and I couldn’t be any more happy, comfortable with myself, and proud.”

Sullivan, who is gay and is a longtime friend of Cooper’s, had asked the CNN anchor for his reaction to a recent Entertainment Weekly story about the importance of gay celebrities coming out of the closet to combat America’s bullying epidemic.

“Andrew, as you know, the issue you raise is one that I’ve thought about for years,” Cooper responded. “Even though my job puts me in the public eye, I have tried to maintain some level of privacy in my life. Part of that has been for purely personal reasons. I think most people want some privacy for themselves and the people they are close to.”

Anderson Cooper: ‘The fact is, I’m gay’ | The Lookout – Yahoo! News.

Cuando ser gay era delito | Metrópoli | elmundo.es

Cuando ser gay era delito | Metrópoli | elmundo.es.

A few things you’ll see in issue two of JABR « justabitradical

A few things you’ll see in issue two of JABR  justabitradical.

Catholics Against Freedom of Religion (again!). The Politics of Religion – NYTimes.com

Why am I surprised ? I shouldn’t be surprised that today’s New York Times has the following editiorial:

The Politics of Religion – NYTimes.com

One of the world’s biggest companies is at it again. They’re using a trick they’ve used since their inception: The Perversion of Language. In the birth-control debacle they are asserting their freedom of religion to take away the freedom of religion of women. It goes something like this: The Catholic Church is free to ignore the constitutional rights and freedoms of American citizens and impose their dogma on society. They want the freedom of religion to take away your freedom of religion.

Early Christian writers, around the time of St. Augustine, forged the concept beautifully with (entirely illogical) statements like: “Unless you accept Christ you are not free.” With the passing of time the world has had the opportunity to see the Catholic Church meant this quite literally.

Jews had to learn this lesson first hand and repeatedly. Here are some pearls of Catholic/Jewish history:

  • Jews and Saracens [Muslims] are not to be allowed to have christian servants in their houses.

The evidence of Christians is to be accepted against Jews in every case, since Jews employ their own witnesses against Christians, and that those who prefer Jews to Christians in this matter are to lie under anathema, since Jews ought to be subject to Christians and to be supported by them on grounds of humanity alone.

1179 A.D., Third Lateran Council

  • Jews shall be compelled to make satisfaction to churches for tithes and offerings due to the churches, which the churches were accustomed to receive from Christians for houses and other possessions, before they passed by whatever title to the Jews.

difference of dress distinguishes Jews or Saracens [Muslims] from Christians in some provinces, but in others a certain confusion has developed so that they are indistinguishable. Whence it sometimes happens that by mistake Christians join with Jewish or Saracen women, and Jews or Saracens with christian women. In order that the offence of such a damnable mixing may not spread further, under the excuse of a mistake of this kind, we decree that such persons of either sex, in every christian province and at all times, are to be distinguished in public from other people by the character of their dress.

They [Jews and Saracens] shall not appear in public at all on the days of lamentation and on passion Sunday.

It would be too absurd for a blasphemer of Christto exercise power over Christians. We therefore renew in this canon, on account of the boldness of the offenders, what the council of Toledo providently decreed in this matter: we forbid Jews to be appointed to public offices, since under cover of them they are very hostile to Christians.

1215 A.D., Fourth Lateran Council

Is that you Mr. Goebbels, there on the right?

…Oh yes, then there was slavery…

  • You have purposed with the favor of divine clemency to bring under your sway the said mainlands and islands with their residents and inhabitants and to bring them to the Catholic faith.

Papal Bull, Alexander VI, 1493, Inter Caetera

  • Extended to the Catholic nations of Europe dominion over discovered lands during the Age of Discovery. Along with sanctifying the seizure of non-Christian lands, it encouraged theenslavement of native, non-Christian peoples in Africa and the New World.
  • “To invade, search out, capture, vanquish, and subdue all Saracens [Muslims] and paganswhatsoever, and other enemies of Christ wheresoever placed, and the kingdoms, dukedoms, principalities, dominions, possessions, and all movable and immovable goods whatsoever held and possessed by them and to reduce their persons toperpetual slavery.”

Papal bull, Pope Nicholas V, 1455, Romanus Pontifex

  • …Authorised Alfonso V of Portugal to reduce any “Saracens (Muslims) and pagans and any other unbelievers” to perpetual slavery. This facilitated the Portuguese slave trade from West Africa.

Papal bull, Pope Nicholas V, 1452, Dum Diversas

Then we have Pope Pius IX incredible rant written in 1864. It’s called Syllabus of Errors and in it the Pope goes on to enumerate the world’s many errors.

Here are a few amusing ones:

15. [It is an error to say that] Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true.

23. [It is an error to say that] Roman pontiffs and ecumenical councils have wandered outside the limits of their powers, have usurped the rights of princes, and have even erred in defining matters of faith and morals.

24. [It is an error to say that] The Church has not the power of using force, nor has she any temporal power, direct or indirect.

38. [It is an error to say that] The Roman pontiffshave, by their too arbitrary conduct, contributed to the division of the Church into Eastern and Western.

55. [It is an error to say that] The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church.

77. [It is an error to say that] In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State, to the exclusion of all other forms of worship.

78. Hence it has been wisely decided by law, in some Catholic countries, that persons coming to reside therein shall enjoy the public exercise of their own peculiar worship.

Pope Pius IX, 1864, Syllabus of Errors

Thanks for the front row seats, Mein Führer! Are we going to get season tickets?

Oh but all of that is old news… it’s history. Or is it? Apparently not. Various Catholic groups in America have commenced legal action to oppose the inclusion of birth control in basic health coverage. The Catholic Church feels they have a right to force you to follow their religion. How about that as religious freedom?

NAACP Endorses Gay Marriage

Less than two weeks after President Barack Obama announced his public support forgay marriage, a prominent African-American civil rights organization is following suit.

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People’s board of directors voted to endorse gay marriage on Saturday, according to a tweet from NAACP officerMaxim Thorne.

NAACP Endorses Gay Marriage.

(My) Recycled Intellectuality. Umberto Eco on Political Correctness

We’re going out to lunch… and when we return, if sufficiently sober, I’ll take on the translation of an Umberto Eco article for L’Espresso (arrogant individual I am.) If you already read Italian (as Angry Ricky probably does- he mentioned Eco a couple of days ago, that’s what reminded me of this article.) Here’s the original. Even if you speak Italian, you may not understand the title as it’s Milanese slang. I remember paying eight euros for a coca-cola in Milan- OUTRAGEOUS. Anyway, there’s no direct translation for the title, but its sentiment is basically bloody idiot. Ostrega means oyster, comparable to the Castillian Spanish exclamation hostia. Pistola means gun. You do the math. The subtitle is “repertoire of gentle offence”.

Pistola dell’ostrega 

Repertorio di offese gentili
Umberto Eco 

Il Politically Correct è un vero e proprio movimento d’idee nato nell’università americana, d’ispirazione liberal e radical, e quindi di sinistra, volto al riconoscimento del multiculturalismo, per ridurre alcuni radicati vizi linguistici che stabilivano linee di discriminazione nei confronti di qualsiasi minoranza. E dunque si è iniziato a dire ‘blacks’ e poi ‘Afro Americans’ invece di ‘negri’, ‘gay’ invece dei mille e notissimi altri appellativi sprezzanti riservati agli omosessuali. Naturalmente questa campagna per la purificazione del linguaggio ha prodotto il proprio fondamentalismo, sino ai casi più vistosi in cui alcune femministe avevano proposto di non dire più ‘history’ che per via del pronome ‘his’ faceva pensare che la storia fosse ‘di lui’, bensì ‘herstory’, storia di lei – ovviamente ignorando l’etimologia greco-latina del termine, che non implica alcun riferimento di genere.
Però la tendenza ha assunto anche aspetti neoconservatori o francamente reazionari. Se tu decidi di chiamare le persone in carrozzella non più handicappati e neppure disabili, ma ‘diversamente abili’, e poi non gli costruisci le rampe d’accesso ai luoghi pubblici, evidentemente hai ipocritamente rimosso la parola, ma non il problema. E del pari si dica della sostituzione di disoccupato con ‘nullafacente a tempo indefinito’ o di licenziato con ‘in transizione programmata tra cambiamenti di carriera’. Chissà perché un banchiere non si vergogna della sua definizione e non insiste per essere chiamato operatore nel campo del risparmio. Se ti cambiano il nome è per dimenticare che qualcosa non funziona nella cosa stessa.
Su questi e infiniti altri problemi si intrattiene Edoardo Crisafulli con il suo libro ‘Il politicamente corretto e la libertà linguistica’, che mette a nudo tutte le contraddizioni, i pro e i contro di questa tendenza – e tra l’altro è anche molto divertente. Leggendolo però mi veniva da riflettere al caso curioso del nostro paese. Mentre altrove esplodeva e si diffondeva il Politically Correct da noi si è sempre più sviluppato il Politicamente Scorretto. Se una volta i nostri uomini politici, leggendo su un foglietto, dicevano: “Emerge che si consente che, a una politica delle convergenze, ancorché parallele, si preferirebbe una scelta asintotica che eliminasse anche singoli punti d’intersezione”, oggi si preferisce dire: “Dialogo? In culo a quegli sporchi figli di puttana!”. È vero che anche un tempo nei circoli paleocomunisti si usava bollare l’avversario come ‘mosca cocchiera’ e in parlamento, durante le risse, si facevano scelte lessicali più incontinenti di quelle di uno scaricatore del porto, ma erano territori per così dire delimitati, ove si accettava un costume – come peraltro avveniva nei casini di venerata memoria, dove le signore non erano più verbalmente controllate di un parlamentare. Oggi invece la tecnica dell’insulto è teletrasmessa, segno di fede inconcussa nei valori della democrazia.
Si era iniziato probabilmente con Bossi, il cui celodurismo alludeva ovviamente a un celofloscismo altrui, e l’appellativo di ‘Berluskaz’ era inequivocabile, ma la cosa è dilagata. Stefano Bartezzaghi, nella sua rubrica del ‘Venerdì di Repubblica’, cita dei giochi d’insulto oggi in circolazione, ma a livello tutto sommato bonario. Per cui, onde contribuire anch’io all’addolcimento del Politicamente Scorretto italiano, dopo aver consultato una serie di dizionari anche dialettali, mi permetto di suggerire alcune espressioni tutto sommato bonaccione e gentili per insultare l’avversario, quali verbigrazia: pistola dell’ostrega, papaciugo, imbolsito, crapapelata, piffero, marocchino, pivellone, ciulandario, morlacco, badalucco, pischimpirola, tarabuso, balengu, piciu, cacasotto, malmostoso, lavativo, magnasapone, tonto, allocco, vaterclòs, caprone, magnavongole, zanzibar, bidone, ciocco, bartolomeo, mona, perdabàall, sguincio, merlo, dibensò, spaccamerda, tapiro, belinone, tamarro, burino, lucco, lingera, bernardo, lasagnone, vincenzo, babbiasso e/o babbione, grand e gross ciula e baloss, saletabacchi, fregnone, lenza, scricchianespuli, cagone, giocondo, asinone, impiastro, ciarlatano, cecè, salame, testadirapa, facciadimerda, farfallone, tanghero, cazzone, magnafregna, pulcinella, zozzone, scassapalle, mangiapaneatradimento, gonzo, bestione, buzzicone, cacacammisa, sfrappolato, puzzone, coatto, gandùla, pagnufli, cichinisio, brighella, tombino, pituano, pirla, carampana, farlocco, flanellone, ambroeus, bigàtt, flippato, fricchettone, gabolista, gaglioffo, bietolone, gadano, fighetta, blacboc, imbranato, balordo, grèbano, piattola, impagliato, asparagio, babbuino, casinaro, bagolone, cucuzzaro, accattone, barabba, loffio, tappo, caporale, toni, macaco, baluba, pappone, pizipinturro, polentone, bonga, quaquaraquà, tarpàno, radeschi, peracottaro, ciculaté, mandruccone, paraculo, fanigottone, scamorza, scricio, mezzasega, rocchettée, pataccaro, pinguino, margniflone, mortodesonno, sbragone, mortadella, scorreggione, pappamolla, furfantello, scioccherello, stolto, sventato e biricchino.

Update: 6:12 PM

Back from lunch and overly sober, so I’ve poured myself a glass of rioja. I complained about the price of a coca-cola in Milan a few hours ago, but discovered it’s possible to pay 8 euros for water right here… It’s called Bezoya, and actually comes in a lovely glass bottle- which I brought home. Now I don’t know what I’m going to do with it. In totally unrelated news. We have a new, large television. As Mike was driving yesterday he saw a big sign that said, if you buy a TV at Media Markt (that’s a German chain of electronics stores all over the EU)- bring in your old TV and we will give you 2 euros off for every kilogram your old TV weighs. He loves that sort of thing and what made him even happier was that we had his late mother’s GIANT old TV in the basement. We left it there because it takes three men to move it and we were too lazy to ever dispose of it. Anyway, our giant new flatscreen only cost 120 euros after the discount, which is about 150 dollars. I told Mike that media Markt probably got these TV’s on ebay from the London rioters last year. Was it last year or this year? Back to the point- here’s Umberto Eco:

“Political Correctness is a true and proper movement. It was born in American universities of liberal and radical inspiration, therefore a movement of the Left, with the aim of acknowledging multiculturalism and reducing some of the ingrained linguistic vices that established lines of discrimination confronting various minorities. The movement began by saying “blacks” and later “African Americans” instead of “ni—r”. Then, “gay” instead of the thousands of other notorious options reserved for disparaging homosexuals.

Naturally, this campaign for the purification of language has produced a genuine fundamentalism, which has led to the notable case in which some feminists have proposed to no longer say “history” since it begins with the pronoun “his”, as they thought this meant that history was “his”. Instead they propose we say “herstory” – her (hi)story – obviously ignoring the Greco-Latin etymology which has no gender implications.

However, the tendency has also assumed neo-conservative, or frankly, reactionary aspects. If you decide to no longer call people in wheelchairs handicapped or even disabled, but “differently-abled” and then you do not construct access ramps in public places, it is evident that you have hypocritically removed the word but not the problem. And the same is true if you substitute saying “indefinitely unoccupied” for fired or “in a program of transition to change careers” for unemployed. Who knows why a banker isn’t ashamed of his title and doesn’t insist on being called an operator in the field of savings. If it’s not working, changing the name won’t fix it.

On these and an infinity of other problems, Edoardo Crisafulli amuses his readers in his book “The Politically Correct and Linguistic Liberty”, which strips naked all of these contradictions. He takes on both sides, pro and con, and is always very entertaining. Reading it, however, I came to reflect on the curious case of our country (Italy). While Political Correctness exploded elsewhere, in our case it was diffused and instead we are always developing more and more Political Incorrectness. If, at one time, one would read a newspaper and a politician would say: “As a politics of convergence is emerging, one would prefer an asymptotic choice that eliminated single points of intersection”; today he prefers to say: “Dialogue? To Hell with that dirty son of a bitch!”

It is true that at one time in old Communist circles they used to label the adversary  “horseflies” and in speaking during meetings, they might have chosen to use a lexicon more insulting than that of a sailor, but that was in a time when there were no limits to what one could say – it was accepted as an affectation – as was once the case in the gentlemen’s clubs of venerated memory – where the gentlemen were not verbally inhibited. Today, instead, the technique of an insult is televised, a sign of unconcious faith in the valor of democracy.

It probably began with Bossi(Umberto Bossi of the right-wing Northern League)), in which his manly hardness obviously alludes to the softness of other people, and the appellation of “Berluskaz(Berlusconi + Cazzo)” was unmistakable but the thing spread widely. Stefano Bartezzaghi, writing under the name Venerdi di Repubblica, cites the play of insults today in circulation, but in good fun, all things considered.

Therefore, I too must contribute to the sweetness of Politically Incorrect Italian, and as I have consulted a series of dictionaries and dialects, permit me to suggest some polite and good-natured expressions with which to insult your enemy, graceful words:  pistola dell’ostrega, papaciugo, imbolsito, crapapelata, piffero, marocchino, pivellone, ciulandario, morlacco, badalucco, pischimpirola…

Family Research Institute Chief: Obama’s Probably Gay, Wants Our Kids To Be Gay Too / Queerty

Today in the world of cuckoo statements from heads of certified hate groups: Family Research Institute chief Paul Cameron claims that Obama has probably “participated in homosexual acts,” notes Right Wing Watch.

Cameron also says Obama’s now complicit with a movement that wants “every little boy and girl” to give homosexuality a try. Said Cameron on Crosstalk, a Christian radio show:

Homosexuality is the one sin, or the one habit, that is 24/7. It is homosexuality all the time. And actually, while I’m not sure about the claims by the various people who have reported that Obama has at least participated at times with them in homosexual acts, this certainly lends some credence.

Ah, yes, “the various people.” The Various People are always spreading weird gossip about me, too. Like, that I totally cheated on my boyfriend with that other dude on Fire Island last summer. And that they definitely saw me at McDonald’s getting two Big Macs the other day. The Various People are always trying to take me down.

Full story here: 

Family Research Institute Chief: Obama’s Probably Gay, Wants Our Kids To Be Gay Too / Queerty.

James Lankford, GOP Rep, Opposes Laws Against Gay Employee Discrimination

Mitt Romney’s prep school classmates recall pranks, but also troubling incidents – The Washington Post

From the Washington Post: In an English class, Gary Hummel, who was a closeted gay student at the time, recalled that his efforts to speak out in class were punctuated with Romney shouting, “Atta girl!”

Mitt Romney’s prep school classmates recall pranks, but also troubling incidents – The Washington Post.

OMG, I have a Republican friend & she nominated me for an award!

I have to begin by saying I’m very happy today, my happiness began last night. As I’ve mentioned I’m a bit from everywhere, I’ve lived on three continents- but I only have one citizenship. Having grown up in America (legally), I was given the choice at 21 to become a citizen, or go. I chose to go because I always felt more at home in the EU. Before I was eighteen, because of family, I could have opted for Spanish or Brazilian citizenship- but in either case that would have involved compulsory military service (it was the law in both countries back then), and I’m not well suited to following instructions. You put me near a red button and tell me not to push it, chances are you’ll soon hear a BOOM! I’ll have started World War III, just because someone told me not to push a button. So I decided to be kind to the Spanish & Brazilian armies and save them from me. France was kind enough to give me a dispensation from military service. I explained that I drink, I smoke, I complain a lot, I’ve got a temper. Do you really want me handling weapons? They said they did, but then a kindly doctor agreed that my asthma was a good reason to let me go on my way. So my citizenship is French and only French and although I was too lazy to drive two hours to vote at the French consulate in Seville yesterday, my candidate of choice won anyway! My new President is François Hollande. I am what is known in France as a Socialiste Champagne, in Germany as Champagner-Linken, in Switzerland Cüpli-Sozialisten. In Italy we’re known as Radical Chic and in Portugal as Esquerda-Caviar. The criticism goes that we’re wealthy people who push left-wing ideas, and somehow that’s incompatible. I can say wholeheartedly it’s not incompatible. I do like my champagne and caviar on occasion, but I also don’t complain about paying 43% income tax. I do complain about my property taxes, but that’s a long story, one that would merit its own post.

A few weeks ago I discovered Bird. Not like a casting director would discover a starlet on his couch, but in that internet way. You click here, then you click there, then you’re reading about property prices in Bratislava and somehow you end up buying a Nicer Dicer. Bird is not a socialist, not the champagne kind or any other kind. We’ve never talked about it, but I’m pretty sure she’s a Republican. She’s also a Christian. Those two things alone mean that theoretically we shouldn’t get along. But in some weird way we do. Maybe it’s because I’m a left-winger who drives a huge SUV and knows how to shoot. In fact, I shoot better than Dick Cheney and my evidence is that I never accidentally shot a friend in the face. I did shoot my brother in the leg once, but it was a BB and I even managed to convince him it was an accident. Small harm, small foul. On the other hand Bird isn’t a typical right-winger. She’s got a strong libertarian streak. A don’t you get in my business thing. More than that, she’s got great compassion and she puts that compassion above ideology. She does her own thing and I love that in people.

Today she nominated me for the Versatile Blogger Award. Quite appropriate as I’ve already got a Versatile Gay Man Award. This is the first award I’ve ever received that comes with instructions. I didn’t know awards came with instructions except maybe the Oscars. Under any Oscar statuette you’ll find the words “insert into anus”.  Not every Oscar winner follows those instructions, but Meryl Streep did. Hence this look on her face:

The instructions for my award don’t involve inserting anything anywhere. They are:

  • Add the award to your blog. 
  • Thank the blogger who gave it to you and include a link to their blog. 
  • Mention 7 random things about yourself.
  • List the rules.
  • Give the award to 15 or more bloggers – I’m going to break this rule and keep the number of nominations short.

I’ve done the first two things, so now 7 random things about myself:

1. When a conservative told me they were going to give me an award, I was expecting this:

2. I’m 5’9  and Mike is 5’10, so ever since we’ve been together I buy shoes from a website called Tall Men Shoes. So I’m taller than Mike.

3. I have a glass, I know my glass, I only like to drink iced tea and juice from my glass. It’s slightly misshapen. If you bring me a non-alcoholic beverage in another glass, I’ll go to the kitchen and pour it into my glass.

4. We lost a lot of money and some of our investments turned to dust when the financial crisis hit in 2007/2008, I thought our business was going down.

5. Four friends helped us. One transferred $130,000 into our account. The other three got together and gave us $30,000. We gave an expensive car we owned to the three, and tomorrow we’re paying back the last that’s owed on the $130,000. She never complained or asked for the money, not once.

6. When I was a child I didn’t want to be a fireman or an astronaut. I wanted to be a dictator.

7. I own a 19th century, French tiara. I say I bought it to complement my 17th century Italian Madonna bust- but if I’m home alone, I take it off the Madonna and wear it.

Now, who am I awarding this to? 15 or more bloggers? No way. But here’s your award, do with it what you will. My top picks in no particular order:

1. Sweet Mother Lover, because she’s funny and very versatile, she’s been with boys and girls, and she’s Irish-Colombian. Yes, seriously, Irish Colombian. What’s more versatile than having a gun in one hand, holding a rosary in the other and transporting drugs in your stomach?

2. God and Son, he’s not very versatile, but he is very funny. It’s atheist humour, so if you’re a Christian, I don’t recommend you visit his blog. Stephen Fry says he’s like that kid with the magnifying glass killing ants.

3. My Life with Tits, you don’t get more versatile than Eli. He’s smart, he’s cute, he’s trans and he’s just bought his first suit.

4. Free Penny Press, totally versatile. There’s poetry, there are pictures, there’s even Basquiat- and genealogy and jazz funerals.

5. Colinology  is my favourite mini-gay. He’s seventeen, extremely intelligent and embarking on his first great adventures in life and love.

6. Angry Ricky, he’s my Mormon. Not actually my Mormon, but the only Mormon I know.  Some days Mike asks me, how’s your Mormon doing? His versatility comes in the form of reconciling sexuality and religion. He does it through critical thinking (most of the time.)

and finally

7. Caption America, totally versatile, totally random and totally funny.

So there… awards given. Done and dusted. This took ages. Don’t anyone even dream of giving me another award. I’m exhausted. I’d pour myself a glass of wine, but it’s only 3:05, which means I have to wait another one hour and 55 minutes. That’s random fact number eight about me, on work days, I only drink after 5pm.

Project ProteKT: Calling all parents, teachers, educators, school staff. We want your opinions!

Are you a parent, teacher or educator? Are you involved with children and teens? We would like your opinions on the prevention and combat of anti-lgbt bullying.

1. What anti-bullying policies have been the most successful at your school?

2. What is the best way for a child/teen to approach the issue with their school? Informally or with a written complaint? What should be contained in the complaint?

3. How can the situation be handled without further negative repercussions (backlash) for the bullying victim?

4. What are your thoughts and suggestions for victims and for schools?

Project ProteKT

Background:

The Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network reports that:

  • Nearly 9 out of 10 LGBT youth (86.2%) report being verbally harassed at school.
  • More than 60 percent of LGBT students said they have felt unsafe at school because of their sexual orientation.
  • Nearly 45 percent of LGBT students report being physically harassed in school.
  • Nearly one-third of LGBT students nationwide have said they have missed a day of school in the past month because of feeling unsafe.

These numbers make it clear that anti-LGBT bullying is a pandemic within American schools.

Mission:

Project ProteKT is a collaborative, volunteer effort, aimed at assisting LGBTQ youth in the prevention and combat of bullying. We hope to guide you through the processes of lodging complaints and ensuring your rights are respected. We also aim to make parents and communities aware of bullying that may be occurring in their children’s schools as well as recognizing successful efforts to stamp out bullying throughout the world.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 645 other followers